HY RU EN
Asset 3

Loading

End of content No more pages to load

Your search did not match any articles

The Lack of Logic of a Life-Sentence

By Vahan Bournazian

Last week at the National Assembly and at an International Conference held in Yerevan the issue of persons sentenced to life imprisonment was discussed. The basic question that we need to ask is whether we believe in the value of individuals and the potential of rehabilitation, or in simple punishment. If we do believe in rehabilitation then a life-sentence is illogical because it precludes rehabilitation.

The goal of a criminal sentence is either to punish or rehabilitate or both. Punishment for life does not erase the crime or repair the victim, and no punishment can. While preventing crime and protecting potential victims is a valuable state pursuit, often tied to rule of law, it is not a pursuit achieved through punishment.

Statistics show that individuals do not consider, or even know, the punishment for a crime before they commit it, so punishing one person does not teach another person anything:  the death penalty has never stopped murder.   Likewise, a life-sentence does not motivate a prisoner to become a better person because there is no reason to become a better person – the prisoner will be in prison for life.

Considering this, it is more logical and more beneficial for society to pursue rehabilitation. Armenia identifies itself as a Christian nation; consider our Constitution, Art. 8.1. Jesus Christ taught the value of each individual, even identifying Himself with prisoners (Matthew 25).

Also, Armenia is a small nation in a small country with no resources more valuable than the human resource which is our population. We do not have the luxury of wasting any resource, including individuals; we are not wealthy enough to forgo attempting to create productive individuals that can contribute to our society’s future development.  The accepted definition of a developed society is a society made-up of developed individuals.[1] 

The concept that individuals are either good or bad is false.  It is our conduct, our acts, that are either good or bad, legal or illegal.  We all know good people who have done bad things.  We ourselves are guilty of our own mistakes. And because none of us is without sin we value forgiveness.

A life-sentence does not prevent crime, precludes rehabilitation, precludes forgiveness and fails to value individuals.  Although an alternative system which promotes and assesses rehabilitation will require effort, models exist in other countries which can be adapted to Armenia, and it is illogical and morally wrong not to pursue such reform.


[1] Amartya Sen, Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, Development as Freedom, 1999.

Comments (3)

Armen
"I thought imprisonment was basically for isolating the dangerous individuals from society, and thats all." Yes, that is correct, and I believe that is exactly what the author is addressing. Because when imprisonment is ONLY for isolation from society, it guarantees a continuation of the cycle of crime leading to imprisonment, because nothing changes in that cycle. If that's the society that you as an individual want to live in, that will be your choice. But, at least know what you are choosing for and choosing against. To imprison for life costs the society an enormous amount of money and potentially wastes the "resource" of the individual imprisoned. Take Portugal for example. That country was the most drug infested country in Europe. They made a daring decision to decriminalize all drugs and mandate rehabilitation instead of imprisonment. Everyone else screamed that it would destroy the country. But, something surprising happened instead. Crime rates dropped by 50% as did addiction rates. Today, Portugal is the third most peaceful country in the world. That is not by coincidence. That is cause and effect! And, please do not confuse drug rehab with other kinds of rehabilitation. There are various kinds of rehabilitation. Someone can be rehabilitating from a stoke, from drug addiction, or from criminal behavior. They are all different forms of rehab with differing time-lines depending upon the need and reason for rehabilitation. Criminal rehabilitation corresponding to a life sentence would never be "a few months and then you're free". It would be several years, at least; but, what society gets for its "investment" is far more beneficial to all.
Raffi
did someone tell this person that this logic advertise the increase of crime and indirectly say to the criminal to go ahead do your thing and we will put you in a rehab for few months and then you're free. I suppose when something really bad happen to some member of his family, we'll see what will e his opinion on this topic.
Vahag
I thought imprisonment was basically for isolating the dangerous individuals from society, and thats all.

Write a comment

Hetq does not publish comments containing offensive language or personal attacks. Please criticize content, not people. And please use "real" names, not monikers. Thanks again for following Hetq.
If you found a typo you can notify us by selecting the text area and pressing CTRL+Enter