HY RU EN
Asset 3

Loading

End of content No more pages to load

Your search did not match any articles

Tigran Paskevichyan

A Repatriate’s Response: “It’s not what I have come for”

“I was young. The elders would gather in the village where we were staying. They would talk and tell me – look outside. No one listened,” recalls Hakob Bashmakyan, a repatriate from Iraq (1947) who presently resides in Montebello (California, USA). 

After moving to Armenia, many of the repatriates had the sense of fear and fright trying to recall “sins” from the “past life” that could have resulted in violence and pressures against them, as well as exile. “We were a mother and son. My father was a Tashnag. If they found out, we too might have been exiled. But no one informed on my father,” said Mr. Bashmakyan.

 If they somehow managed to shun violence, pressure and exile, then the inconveniences of   Soviet life would “haunt” immigrants throughout their lives. Perhaps that is why regardless of whether the narrator or his family have been subject to political persecutions or not, in all interviews he speaks about the violence and pressures, and exile by confidently amplifying and exaggerating numbers. 

Zabel Chugaszyan who immigrated from the USA in 1947 and presently lives in Los Angeles, (California, USA), claims that during the night of June 13 and the morning of June 14, 1949, 160,000 people were exiled from Armenia. “My father used to work in a silk atelier. He was a party member and was told he would be working that night. Before going to work, he instructed us not to open the door to anyone – to just switch off all lights and go to bed. Then he left. He came back in the morning and told us that everybody was being put in cars and taken away.”

Jean Kyureghyan, who immigrated from France in 1947 and presently lives in Paris, says that 50,000 were exiled to Siberia in just two nights. He adds: “They didn’t touch most French-Armenians. Most. I can count the number of families on my fingers, who immigrated from France, that they deported. But tens of thousands of Syrians and Lebanese were.” 

The problem here does not lie in the accuracy of the numbers but rather the impression created from the Soviet reality, which was gradually translating into personal experience. Discrimination and various forms of enforcement exercised by the state were also among the factors shaping it.

 Most of repatriate, when interviewed, complained that sons (of relevant age) of immigrants were not conscripted. “During Stalin’s time, they didn’t conscript repatriates into the army, arguing that we had no military training. The truth was they didn’t trust us,” recounts Martiros Gyulderyan, an immigrant from France (1947) who then migrated to the USA.

After having graduated with top marks from the Institute of Foreign Languages (Armenia) and pursing a teacher’s career in Byurakan village for two years, Martiros was unexpectedly drafted into military service. He says he was happy at first. The challenges came later. “I was the only one with higher education in our unit. They gave me the lowest job – getting the explosive shells. I was often asked about life in France, etc. I was somewhat naive and told them the truth. One day, at the unit, a KGB representative summoned me and said, “You know what we do to guys like you who seek to lower the morale of soldiers? You will come with me to the office where we will continue our conversation.” During the Stalin era, it was clear that someone could get exiled for at least ten years for something like that. At least. Luckily for me, the next day Khrushchev gave a speech at the Communist Party Congress and exposed the cult of personality policy,” he said. 

Such inconveniences caused by army life have been engraved in the memory of Hakob Filyan, a 1949 repatriate from the USA who currently lives in Paris. “In the army, they suspected that I was a spy. The Special Branch would always ask me questions during the three years I served. “When did you come from America?” “Why did you come?” Always the same questions. I told them, if they suspected me of something then why did they accept me in the army,” he said.  

 

Attempts by state security agencies to enlist people were another reason used to emotionally suppress repatriates and urge discomfort towards life in Soviet Armenia.

 In 1946, Souren Boursalyan immigrated to Armenia from Lebanon, along with his family. A year later he was already a student at the Yerevan Fine Arts and Theater Institute. In 1951, right before he was going to take the last of the state graduation exams, the future film director was arrested. 

In his “Emasculated Generation” memoir, Boursalyan writes that the reason for his arrest was that he had refused to serve the KGB. He was amicably asked to “…go to my friend, try to explore his mood, put it down and present it to them,” which he would not do as it would be an act against his own conscience. However, neither could he avoid doing it, as he was being forced to. Thus, he decided to “fool” the Chekists (officials of the security service) ․ Such a careless and not-thought-through intention “earned” him a 10-year punishment, part of which he served in Siberia. He returned to Armenia after Stalin’s death and then left for the United States in 1978.

 

Martiros Vardanyan, a 1946 immigrant from Syria who presently lives in Glendale, recalls happened to his brother, citing it as a vivid example unveiling the core of the Soviet regime. 

“My brother got admitted to the Department of English Language at the Pedagogic Institute. In early 1948, he was taken to the KGB right from the lecture room and interrogated. He was asked who he was friends with, who is unhappy, who possesses anti-Soviet literature, etc. He was released at 3 am. All that had its adverse effect on my brother. He got sick and was confined to bed for around three months. People from the KGB would come to see if he was sick or was just pretending. Once he recovered and went to the Institute, people from the KGB again showed up and again the same hell began. Fear made him sick again and this time his condition was more severe. To treat him, we were forced to sell everything. After he finally recovered, he quit the Institute and left for a remote village where he worked as a teacher.”

 Ingenuity is what saved Paul Antaramian, a 1947 immigrant from the USA who presently lives in Fresno, from an undesirable collaboration with the KGB. 

“I was walking on foot when a car approached me. They told me, “hey buddy, get in the car, we’ll take you to wherever you go.” I said “no”. I was of two minds, to get in the car or not. Eventually I got in and they took me to Nalbandyan 104 (the state security building).

They told me they needed my help; information about some people and nobody should know about it as it was a state secret. I said I wouldn’t be able to do that and to their question “why?” I answered that I had just got married and my wife was always complaining that I was talking in my sleep. I don’t remember what happened then, but they never again came after me.”

Apparently, it would not be appropriate to say that all repatriates experienced similar situations, but since there were living in closed communities and communicated with each other, every pressure imposed on their relative, neighbor or someone they knew became something common for all of them and a personal tragedy for each. In addition to other reasons to leave Armenia, such inconveniences of the Soviet life would subconsciously pile up, eventually accounting for their decision to migrate. In the meantime, the KGB was not napping and kept on electing “allies” even from among repatriates that had already applied to the Passport and Visa Office (OVIR) for emigration. 

Sargis Mazmanian, who immigrated from Romania in 1947 and presently lives in Los Angeles, recalls one such incident. 

“I was called to the OVIR at 5 pm. Two people that were standing there asked if I was Sargis Mazmanian. I said yes, and we entered OVIR, going down the stairs to the basement. There was somebody siting there. He had a very cruel face with a scar. He did not introduce himself and simply asked my full name. To tell the truth, the scene scared me to death. He asked why I wanted to leave. What could I reply given the circumstances other than, “to find my way in life.” He asked me whether I would help them if they agreed, and subconsciously, without giving a second thought, I rose and said, “It’s not what I have come for.”

Translator Ani Babayan


This article is prepared as part of the  “Two Lives: The Cold War and the Emigration of Armenians” project financed by National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

Comments (8)

Գեւորգ
Խնդրում ենք նկատի ունենաք, որ բոլորն էլ լավ գիտեն թե ինչը ինչպես եւ ինչու է կատարվել: Ստալինը միայն սփյուռքահայերին չէ որ բնաջինջ էր անում: Շատ տեղացիների էլ էին աքսորում ու գնդակահարում, Ուկրաինացիներին голодомор - ի ենթարկում: Թաթար - մաթարներին հո գլխովին էին աքսորում: Կիսամեռ վիճակում գերի ընկածներին, աջ ու ձախ уклонист ներին, տրոցկիստներին, բուխարինականներին, մաքուր շոր հագնող ինտելիգենտներին, բոլորին վերացնում էին: Սիբիրում ձրի աշխատող էր հարկավոր, անասնական վախ էր հարկավոր, դրա համար էլ արյուն էր հարկավոր, ուստի եւ փրթում էին: Սխալ է այնպիսի մտայնություն ստեղծել, թե աշխարհը ոտքի էր ելել հենց միայն հայերիս դեմ: Գուցե մեր բախտից (կամ ավելի շուտ՝ խելքից) մենք ավելի ենք կորցրել - բայց հերիք է լացենք ու ողբանք: Դրա փոխարեն ներկան պիտի քննել ու փորձել ավելի խելացի ապրել, ողբ ու կոծից օգուտ չկա:
Գեւորգ
3, 4, 5 - ին: //Մեր ներկայի բոլոր արատները գալիս են անցյալից (սովետական)// - Շատ հարգելիներս, Դուք մի փոքր մոլորության մեջ եք: Խնդրում եմ նայեք Րաֆֆու ,,Խաչագողի հիշատակարանն,, ու ,,Խենթը,, (հեղինակի ներածականով ու ծանոթագրություններով) եւ փորձեք անկողմնակալ դատել, հասկանալու համար հայերի դժբախտության վաղ արմատները: Օգտակար կլինի նաեւ Ղարսի անկման պատմության վրա խորհենք՝ որպիսզի հասկանաք հայկական ուղեղների հավաքական որակը: Վերջապես, ՍՈՎԵՏԸ ՉԿԱ ԱՐԴԵՆ եւ այն միայն հայհոյելը շատերի համար անիմաստ ու անընկալելի է: Օրինակի համար, պատկերացրեք հայերի վիճակը, եթե այդ ատելի սովետը պարտվեր հիտլերին (նկատի ունեմ թուրքական կազմ ու պատրաստ դիվիզիաները մեր սահմանի գլխին) - չէ որ Հայաստան աշխարհի հետքը չպիտի մնար օրերի ընթացքում: Եթե կասկածում եք, ապա Ձեզ հետ իմաստ չունի խոսել:
Raffi
To blame the Soviet Union for all the ills of present-day Armenia is foolish and self-deceiving. It's a cop-out pure and simple. The capitalist class now ruling Armenia and the lack of citizen participation in nation-building are the main culprits for Armenia's current morass. Nothing more.
Markar
Yet another article about the misery of life in Soviet Armenia, financed by the National Endowment for Democracy, a propaganda organ of the U.S. state. Instead of thanking the repatriates for their devotion and sacrifice for the country, these articles ridicule them. Where in these articles is there a mention of the little fact that, at the time of the repatriation, the USSR was trying to recover from the invasion of their country and the resulting death of well over 22 million Soviet citizens. Presumably, that is a negligible detail, unworthy of mention. But these stories are financed by a country that has in recent years gone on murderous rampages on three continents and unleashed mass surveillance and repression against its own citizens, all with the excuse that fewer than three thousand Americans were killed on 9/11. Yes, more and more Armenians cherish Soviet life, and they are getting younger. The reason is obvious. Since returning to capitalist rule, Armenia has lost perhaps one-fifth of its population. There are a little more than one half as many Armenians in the southern Caucasus as there were thirty years ago. Towns and villages lie empty. Malnutrition is endemic, as is unemployment. The quality of education has plummeted, and basic healthcare is inaccessible to much of the population. Crime, official and unofficial, has proliferated. Women have been shoved out of positions of power that they held during Soviet times, and they have been silenced. Foreign-owned mines are poisoning the rivers and destroying farmland. A previous generation of young people made themselves the butt of jokes in the west by aping the silliest western fashions. Increasingly, their grandchildren see them as gullible fools.
shahe
It is just the soviet regime of pigs, and still there are people who cherish soviet life. It is for this reason that we are fighting in karabagh, we still have nakhichevan, akhalkalak and Kars ardahan. The soviet union did more damage than the genocide itself. Every single person who still sympathizes with the russo-soviet junta should be regarded as traitor.
Հայկ
Այն որ հայրենադարձ հայերը ավելի շատ էին ենթարկվում բռնաճնշումների, ավիճելի փաստ է։ Դա միանշանակ հաստատվում է արխիվային վիճակագրությամբ։ Պատճառը մեկն էր՝ նրանք չեին անցել հոկտեմբերիկ ֊պիոներ֊ կոմսոմոլ սովետական մամլիչով և, ունեին «կասկածելի» կապիտալիստական անցյալ և ճիշտ պատկերացում կյանքի մասին։ Ճշմարտության դեմ չմեղանչելով, ուզում եմ ասել, որ այսօր էլ այդ արատավոր բացիլը շարունակում է ապրել մեզանից շատերի ուղեղներում։ Հայ ժողովրդի մոտ այդ վտանգավոր վիրուսը պատվաստվել Մոսկվայի կողմից և դեռևս կպահպանվի այնքան ժամանակ, քանի դեռ մնում է Չարիքի կայսրությունը։
Տիգրան
Այս նախագիծը նվիրված է հայրենադարձներին։ Եւ չի ասում, թե միայն հայրենադարձներին են ճնշել։ Ինչ որ կարդում եք, նույնը պատահել է նաեւ տեղացիների հետ։ Ինչ վերաբերվում է Գեւորգի ասածին, թե պետք է ներկան քննել, ամենեւին համաձայն չեմ։ Մեր ներկայի բոլոր արատները գալիս են անցյալից (սովետական)։ Պետք է անցյալը քննենք, որ հասկանանք արմատները։ Շնորհակալություն։
Gevorgin
Հայերի հետևից չէ, Գևորգ ։) Ըստ հոդվածագրի տրամաբանության, միայն հայրենադարձների հետևից էին ընկել։ Հոդվածների այս շարքը գնալով անհամանում է ...

Write a comment

If you found a typo you can notify us by selecting the text area and pressing CTRL+Enter